Because of the bodily laws of electronics, circuit analysis is very procedural. The initial limitation of the doctrine to one’s family eroded with time as courts began to increase the doctrine to enable for the protection of strangers. See State v. Chiarello, 69 N.J.Tremendous. 479, 174 A.second 506 (. 1961). The expansion of the doctrine to include strangers introduced with it a principle of potential legal responsibility. This theory was called the “alter ego” rule. The alter ego rule held that a defendant using lethal pressure to defend a person who was not entitled to use deadly drive would be held criminally liable. See Moore v. State, 25 118, 218 P. 1102 (1923); Leeper v. State, 589 P.second 379 (Wyo.1979). In State v. Greatest, 91 W.Va. 559, 575, 113 S.E. 919, 925 (1922), this Courtroom alluded to the alter ego rule when it was said that “the proper of a …
