Over the previous few weeks, I’ve needed to make important edits to my second e-book, “The Subsequent Wave of Applied sciences.” In doing so, I have been holding in mind Melvin Kranzberg’s six laws of know-how. Rule 403 offers: “Although related, proof may be excluded if its probative worth is considerably outweighed by the hazard of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or deceptive the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or pointless presentation of cumulative proof.”Accordingly, in a homicide case, malicious wounding, or assault where the defendant relies on self-protection or provocation, below Rule 404(a)(2) and Rule 405(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Proof, character evidence within the form of opinion testimony could also be admitted to show that the victim was the aggressor if the probative worth of such proof isn’t outweighed by the concerns set forth within the balancing take a look …
